This was previously “Support for raycast extensions”. OP (@hummingbirdmoth): “This would cover a lot of current requests and attract substantial interest from existing raycast users.” Developer response Monarch will be featuring its own unique extensions ecosystem. After doing research on a couple open source projects, unfortunately supporting Raycast extensions directly presents unique challenges to Monarch that it doesn’t to similar projects. Besides that, it also presents limitations to Monarch’s extension platform design that just don’t make sense to replicate simply for the ability to port over extensions that would actually be easier to build with Monarch’s API anyway. Simply porting extensions also runs the risk of setting the expectation that because other launchers do something a certain way that Monarch will do it that way, and as we’ve seen with recent releases from v0.8+ this is not going to be the case. To be clear I fully expect that Monarch’s Extensions platform will go further and be more powerful than Raycast’s or Alfred’s. I can’t say too much right this moment, but I’ve been thinking on this for quite some time and so far I’ve been able to do things that I was unaware a Mac app could do. It just doesn’t make sense to withhold this power for the sake of parity with tools we intend to surpass.

hummingbirdmoth over 2 years ago

13

Add the ability to use ChatGPT, GPT4, or other LLMs directly within Monarch

rmdashrfv over 2 years ago

18

Alfred has snippets, it's like TextExpander: small pieces of text get expanded into full phrases, or even whole scripts get executed.

Sander Datema about 2 years ago

11

Similar to the Apple reminders support, can we get support for Things 3? In particular, the ability to show upcoming/timed tasks in the main window.

Talon over 2 years ago

5

This is the ability to manage Monarch license keys for your devices yourself. It will be done through the Monarch website: https://monarchlauncher.com

rmdashrfv about 2 years ago

I use the "find" prefix within alfred alot, to find certain folders or files on my system, would love to have the same functionality here.

bold.gear8185 over 2 years ago

8

Currently, the shortcuts app doesn't allow you to have custom icons for different shortcuts. It would be nice if Monarch would allow us to change the default icon of a shortcut that gets shown in the launcher itself. Possibly the use of cmd + e could open a separate editing menu(not editing in the shortcuts app, but there could be a button in the said menu that opens the shortcut app) this is where the icon could be changed with other things. If cmd + e should still open the shortcuts app to change the functionality then I would like to propose the use of (cntrl + e) or (cmd + shift + e) to go into said editing menu(to change the icon and things). This change would allow better customization of the launcher and would make it easier to recognize shortcuts. This is what the icon looks like right now for any shortcut from the shortcuts app:

UnknownCrafts about 2 years ago

1

Similar to force quit

Jay C about 2 years ago

4

You call the function, you keyboard is locked and a monarch stays on top of everything where you can click in a button to unlock

Renê Schneider (renews) about 2 years ago

1

This is just an idea and there is absolutely the possibility that I kill this idea, but wanted to run it by people to look at the long-term viability of Monarch. To make it seamless to sync across devices and across platforms like Windows (and Linux eventually), Monarch Sync would be a super low-cost subscription $3-4 that would manage syncing everything for you, but I would also like to target additional features beyond standard syncing, namely: The ability to have different profiles that contain different Settings, Superlinks, Snippets, Bookmarks, perhaps Clipboard History, history categories, favorites, themes, hotkeys, and a host of other things including an iOS app. This means you'd be able to have a "For Work" profile and a "Personal" profile and be able to switch between the two effortlessly. But also ... I can totally kill this idea, and we would have syncing managed by iCloud/Dropbox on Mac (for free) and that'd be that! It would limit syncing functionality and design that would come with Monarch Sync though. For clarity: it would have absolutely zero impact on any regular usage of Monarch. It would be powerful syncing that other launchers don't have, and this alone would cement the future long-term viability, but also yes it would be a subscription, which I myself am usually against. But it very much would allow me to shift some things around by version 1.0 that would make Monarch even more affordable/accessible. Please let me know your thoughts. It's vitally important that if you're against this idea you let me know why because there is a lot of flexibility here still that I'm grateful to have and because this app belongs to the users. - Michael

rmdashrfv over 2 years ago

19

Idea

Would be nice to install and update from Brew

bold.gear8185 over 2 years ago

Sometime after Monarch v0.9 releases, it will be time to start looking at support for Windows 10 and 11. This will be prioritized based on how much need there is across the Monarch user base and those who would be using Monarch but do not own a Mac.

rmdashrfv about 2 years ago

5

Right now Monarch supports abbreviations like gc for Chrome and vsc for Visual Studio Code, as you note in your manual. I would like to be able to define a custom abbreviation for any arbitrary app. This can use the Superlink interface or a new interface.

A R about 2 years ago

9

I understand that via bookmark search, Monarch keeps track of opened tabs. On the other hand, I would like to simply search through my open tabs (I tend to have a lot of them sometimes) via a quick search in Monarch.

Pramod J over 2 years ago

1

Right now if a contact comes up in your search, it’s a default symbol icon. I add photos to all my contacts because especially with people I don’t know well with common first names, it’s a helpful way to remember their last name and ensure I’m talking to the right person. I don’t know if contacts . app allows serializing the photos, but I’d hope it does. If not, I’d still like the ability to manually add a photo within Monarch.

A R about 2 years ago

3

I’d like to be able to weight up or down particular categories of results from within monarch. For example, if I type the prefix “ch” right now, every contact with ch in their name shows up and Chrome doesn’t. I know you have a short alias gc for Google Chrome. Another example, if I prefix “sl”, an old grad school acquaintance with a last name starting with Sl comes up before Slack. If I type the letter “y”, various browser bookmarks show up first. I understand you’re applying some kind of heuristic so that recently chosen items come up higher, and that’s good, but in general it’d be nice to be able to tell Monarch “apps should count for more, contacts and bookmarks should count for less”.

A R about 2 years ago

3

When searching for files there should be possible to find inside them. With a prefix or not.

HFreixial about 2 years ago

Superlinks as they exist right now are kind of limiting since they can only take in a URL and they have to open an application to pass the URL to. As a workaround for this, we have been able to use the Apple shortcuts app, thanks to Monarch being able to detect individual shortcuts, but this workflow is bad for UX for some commands like the capture timer command (https://github.com/UnknownCrafts/Regent/tree/main/Screenshot%20Utilities#capture-timer) as it opens up the shortcuts app (this is due to how apple shortcuts handle the request that comes via the URL scheme) and takes away the focus from whatever the user wants to capture on the screen, so far I haven’t been able to iron out this issue by just using superlinks. I would like for the custom shell commands menu to still have things in common with superlinks, basically everything minus the “Match check” and “Open with” sections in superlinks, plus bigger text boxes(in height) so that it can be easier to format the shell commands. These shell commands probably won’t faze out the use of the shortcuts app but will help to provide a way better UX, as the shortcuts app won’t have to open up and steal focus. If you don’t want to clutter the root search any further then maybe superlinks could contain the option to save shell commands, the menu would just strip away two sections (“Open With” and “Match Check”).

UnknownCrafts about 2 years ago

2

I use Arc as my browser and there aren’t things such as bookmarks on it, so in its place I use Raindrop.io for saving links now. I would love the ability to search through drops in addition to bookmarks. Thanks!

joshmoxey about 2 years ago

3